What’s a NFL Bettor To Do With Winless Teams? Comparing The “Stumbling Seven” to Last Year’s “Stinky Six”
It sure seems like there are a lot of bad teams in the NFL, and there’s been plenty of talk about how there might be some historically dreadful teams in our midst. There are seven 0-3 teams, which seems high, and some of them have been awful to start the season. Of these seven, which clubs will prove to be the worst?
Let’s look back to last year for some clues. There were six teams that started 0-3 last season, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Detroit, Houston, Kansas City, and St. Louis. I broke down their 0-3 starts in 2008 into different categories:
1. Losing margin in the three games: 4 of the 6 teams had been within single digits of at least one opponent. Only the Lions and Rams had lost all three games by double digits.
2. Yardage in the three games: the 6 teams that started 0-3 had been outgained in 17 of their 18 combined games. The Houston Texans managed to outgain an opponent by 11 yards in a loss. But all the others had been outgained in each game. Most were at least competitive in a game or two, staying within 100 yards of an opponent. Only the Lions and Rams had been outgained by 100+ yards by all three of their opponents.
3. Pointspread Covers: The pointspread is the great equalizer, and four of the teams had covered a game. Only the Lions and Rams were 0-3 against the pointspread.
The Lions and Rams were 2008’s worst teams, being the only NFL clubs to be outscored by over 200 points on the season. Detroit famously finished 0-16, outscored by 249 points on the season, and St. Louis was 2-14, outscored by 233 points. The Kansas City Chiefs also finished 2-14 but they were much more competitive than the other two, being outscored on the year by 149 point.
So the Lions and Rams ended up the worst teams, and were the only clubs to start 0-3 to fit into any of our categories. And they both fit into all three of them.
How Do 2009’s Dregs Compare? Tampa Bay, Carolina, St. Louis, Miami, Cleveland, Tennesse, and Kansas City have all started 0-3 in 2009. Who fits into our scoring, yardage, and pointspread categories of shame?
1. Losing Margin in the three games: Tampa Bay and Cleveland are the only two teams that have lost all three games by double digits.
2. Yardage in the three games: Not a single team has been outgained by triple digits by all of their foes, though Cleveland and Kansas City have been outgained by over 200 yards twice. Remarkably, the Chiefs actually outgained the Raiders 409-166 in their bizarre loss to Oakland. But no team has failed to be at least mildly competitive in at least a single game.
3 Poinstpread Covers. Only Tennessee and St. Louis have covered a pointspread thus far, covering one each. Nobody else has covered a spread, with the Bucs, Panthers, Dolphins, Browns, and Chiefs all 0-3 to the number.
This leaves us with a pair of questions. First, who’s worst? Second, can you possibly bet these teams going forward?
Who’s the worst? While nobody is waving the flag of ineptitude quite as clearly as the Rams and Lions were last year, Tampa Bay and Cleveland both fit into two of our three categories. Though the Bucs were outgained by 311 yards on Sunday against the Giants, they were outgained by only 12 and 85 yards in their other two losses. The Browns maintained contact with the Vikings, outgained by a respectable 42 yards in their opener, but since have been mauled twice, outgained by 239 yards and 293 yards in the two games since then.
Cleveland looks to be worse than anyone on this list. But Tampa’s no prize. Is it any surprise that both of these clubs announced quarterback changes this week? And though they have a win, don’t the Raiders have a chance to surpass all of these clubs with their poor play?
How can you possibly bet these horrible teams? Should we consider all these teams to be “go againsts” going forward in our betting? Probably not. Last year’s “Stinky Six” rebounded against the pointspread the rest of the way, going 39-38-1. The Lions were 7-6 against the spread in their final unlucky 13 games, while the Rams were 6-7 in the betting world. Last year’s Browns had the worst record to the line, going 5-7-1 the rest of the way, but it was a sea of mediocrity the rest of the way.
Takeaways: What to you take away from this look at winless teams? First, it looks like there might not be anyone as bad as the Rams and Lions were last year. If the Browns and the Bucs are the worst so far, there are reasons for them to play hard. Both teams have new coaches, and the players know that no matter how bad they are, it wouldn’t be wise to quit on the guys who will have your fate in their hands after the season. They could also (possibly) be sparked by their replacement quarterbacks.
Secondly, no matter how bad they are so far, these ”Stumbling Seven” are likely to cover about 50% of their pointspreads going forward, which is also true for the teams that look the best so far. Simply betting against these teams because of their rough start is far from a sure-fire moneymaker.
